Machiavelli vs. Erasmus Essay Essay Example

Machiavelli vs. Erasmus Essay Essay Example Machiavelli vs. Erasmus Essay Paper Machiavelli vs. Erasmus Essay Paper Machiavelli vs. ErasmusI believe that both of these positions. to a certain extent and in certain state of affairss. are still relevant today. With some people. the parts of the population that seek merely to derive in their lives. and non lend to the improvement of society. I would state that the Machiavellian attack would be of better usage. Because he is right. a batch of work forces are thankless. fickle. delusory. avoiders of dangers and tidal bore to derive. With these sorts of people. they will seek to take what they can without respect for who they crush. so the lone manner to maintain them in cheque is their fright of the penalties they might have. We evidently don’t have to worry about them killing person for political grounds like in the times when â€Å"The Prince† was written. but I would state that ictus of belongings is still a penalty used today. That is the first thing people go for when seeking penalty or reparations ; money. ownerships or belongings. I think love of state. non needfully the individual running it is the best manner to acquire devotedness from people. So I disagree that those people who follow out of love are less dependable. Particularly right now. as a member of the armed forces. I can talk for myself a many of my companions that we don’t agree with most. if anything. our current leader says or does. But we follow his orders anyhow. because we love this state. and that is greater than any personal ground for non following our President. If anyone even tried to utilize the fright attack. they would neer even acquire elected. That is why they have propaganda and the occasional commercial stating all the good workss they do. non stating who they punished for non holding with them. So possibly in a state where democracy doesn’t decide the leader. Machiavelli’s attack might be used. but in ours. I would state merely for little parts of the population would it be utile. I think Erasmus’s position would be more recognized in today’s universe. We all know some politicians don’t follow a batch of the things he lists a good swayer should make. I don’t agree with him stating that taking an hurt and losing a small of the â€Å"empire† might be a better pick. Not taking those hurts. and demoing the universe that we are a ace power and won’t take things puting down is the best manner to avoid injury in the long tally. But his positions on what a leader should be. and how he should handle the citizens of his state I wholly agree with. The leader should set the good of the people before his ain public assistance. But I don’t think that war brings all the bad lucks of province. sometimes it is necessary to travel to war with those who would convey those bad lucks. I believe that progressives fall under Erasmus’s class with merely a small of Machiavelli. with conservativists utilizing some of both. Judging from the two positions. I would state that the progressives follow more closely to Erasmus because of his attack to peace. Give a small pride and take a hit. avoid war at all costs. These are attacks that. in my sentiment. the most recent broad presidents we’ve had have used. While the conservativists hit right back and went to war. The war might hold caused many bad lucks since so. but who knows what might hold happened to us if we had done nil? We used the fright of penalty attack. and I think it worked merely all right. So in decision. I think Erasmus’s position is the better attack on how to see and handle the citizens of a state. But there are some times when Machiavelli’s attack is necessary. if non to your citizens. so to those who would mistreat them.